HomeForumOthersOff-TopicPrediction Markets

Prediction Markets

Reply to thread
Gold VIP
Feedback Receiver GB Feedback Giver B&W Feedback Receiver Gold Feedback Receiver Silver Feedback Receiver Bronze Feedback Receiver B&W Overachiever
487 posts
Member since:

Polymarket and Kalshi have become the faces of Prediction Markets. What are these prediction markets and are they a blessing or a curse?
Please put all your questions and comments regarding prediction markets here.

66
Student
Feedback Receiver Bronze Feedback Giver B&W Feedback Receiver B&W Casino Critic B&W Game Enthusiast B&W
165 posts
Member since:

With Don jr being involved in both big players, this is the most blatant form of manipulation I’ve seen. And the Americans STILL don’t care.

Novice
33 posts
Member since:

Prediction markets are being sold as “truth machines,” but they look more like a playground for people who already have better access than the rest of us.

Novice
43 posts
Member since:

The integrity issue is obvious. If the people taking the bets, promoting the bets, or resolving the bets have ties to politics, media, or money, why should anyone trust the prices?

Novice
Feedback Giver B&W
55 posts
Member since:

And the gamblers are not innocent either. A lot of these people are not forecasting; they are hunting for loopholes, timing edges, and whatever rumor they can weaponize before the crowd catches up.

Novice
Feedback Giver B&W
55 posts
Member since:

That is why the whole thing feels socially rotten. It turns public events into wagers and encourages people to treat war, elections, and disasters like fantasy sports.

Novice
Feedback Giver B&W
39 posts
Member since:

I keep seeing claims that the son of the U.S. president has been involved around both of the big players. Even if that is only half true, the optics are terrible.

Student
Feedback Giver B&W Feedback Receiver B&W Game Enthusiast B&W
136 posts
Member since:

Optics? More like a warning sign. If political families are anywhere near the same ecosystem as the market makers, people should assume the game is compromised.

Student
Feedback Giver B&W Feedback Receiver B&W Casino Critic B&W Game Enthusiast Bronze Game Enthusiast B&W
135 posts
Member since:

The worst part is how normal people are told this is “democratizing information.” No, it is democratizing exposure to manipulation.

Student
Feedback Receiver Bronze Feedback Giver B&W Feedback Receiver B&W Game Enthusiast B&W Casino Critic B&W
154 posts
Member since:

I wanna bet on gun deaths in the US. Get more guns guys, I need the money!

Novice
33 posts
Member since:

Exactly. The platforms can talk about liquidity all they want, but liquidity is not the same as legitimacy.

Novice
43 posts
Member since:

And the more money flows in, the less anyone wants to ask whether the market is clean. That is how confidence gets replaced by momentum.

Novice
Feedback Giver B&W
55 posts
Member since:

The dangerous thing is that these markets can still sometimes get the outcome right. That makes them look smarter than they are.

Novice
Feedback Giver B&W
55 posts
Member since:

Which means the market can reward insiders while pretending it rewards intelligence. That is a very convenient lie.

Novice
Feedback Giver B&W
39 posts
Member since:

And the social cost is real. People start treating democratic outcomes like casino chips, then act shocked when civic trust collapses.

Student
Feedback Giver B&W Feedback Receiver B&W Game Enthusiast B&W
136 posts
Member since:

It is also economically corrosive. A market that rewards asymmetry will always attract people trying to profit from everyone else’s ignorance.

Join the community

You must be logged in to add a comment.