Trainwreck vs Roshtein – Are high roller influencers for real?

Or they’re wealthy enough to absorb it. Plenty of non-gambling businesses take bigger hits on marketing budgets.

Alice: They’ll eventually lose; the house always wins. The question is whether they’re fronting huge potential losses with someone else’s money.

But those are real losses. Marketing spend is accounted for and deductible. If these are “fake” credits, it’s a different animal altogether.

I’d love a side-by-side of proprietary credit terms versus cash deposits. That’d settle the credibility debate.

In any case, the arms race between them drives viewership. Every time TrainwrecksTV sets a record, the audience holds its breath for Roshtein’s comeback.

Which makes me more cynical. If it’s contrived, it’s just scripted entertainment masquerading as genuine risk.

Maybe that’s fine? It’s not a documentary; it’s a reality show. High drama equals high clicks.

Reality or not, the message to vulnerable viewers is problematic. Big wins seem “easy” when you ignore the credits angle.

Ultimately, unless one of them discloses their bankroll origins, we’ll never know. But the platforms and streamers owe at least a disclaimer: “These spins may use promotional credits.”

Agreed. Transparency measures—clear labeling of credited funds versus personal stakes—would benefit everyone. Then we can focus on the real debate: entertainment value vs. potential harm.

it doesn’t matter if they are real. There will always be people who think they aren’t, and theree will always be poeple who think they are – especially gullible Americans.

As usual, the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. There’ll be real gamblers, but obviously, casino can’t risk their ambassadors going broke, so they’ll be inclined to “help” a little.